Toward Expert Investment Teams: A Multi-Agent LLM System with Fine-Grained Trading Tasks

Paper: 2602.23330 Authors: Kunihiro Miyazaki, Takanobu Kawahara, Stephen Roberts, Stefan Zohren Categories: cs.AI, q-fin.TR

Abstract

This paper introduces a multi-agent LLM framework for autonomous financial trading that explicitly decomposes investment analysis into fine-grained tasks. Unlike conventional approaches that rely on abstract, coarse-grained instructions mimicking analyst and manager roles, this system breaks down the investment workflow into specific, well-defined subtasks. Evaluated on Japanese stock data encompassing prices, financial statements, news, and macroeconomic information under rigorous leakage-controlled backtesting, the framework demonstrates significant improvements in risk-adjusted returns. The research reveals that alignment between intermediate analytical outputs and downstream decision-making preferences is crucial for system performance, and portfolio optimization exploiting low correlation with market indices further enhances results.

Key Contributions

• Introduction of a fine-grained task decomposition approach for multi-agent LLM trading systems, moving beyond abstract role-based instructions
• Comprehensive evaluation framework using Japanese stock market data with multiple information sources (prices, financials, news, macro data) under leakage-controlled backtesting
• Empirical demonstration that fine-grained task decomposition significantly outperforms coarse-grained designs in risk-adjusted returns
• Discovery that alignment between analytical outputs and decision preferences is a critical performance driver
• Portfolio optimization strategy leveraging low correlation with stock indices and inter-system variance for superior performance

Methodology and System Architecture

The proposed framework fundamentally reimagines how LLM agents should be structured for financial trading. Traditional multi-agent systems typically assign broad roles like “analyst” or “portfolio manager” with high-level instructions, which can lead to ambiguous outputs and suboptimal decision-making. This research takes a different approach by explicitly decomposing the investment process into granular, well-defined tasks.

The system architecture consists of multiple specialized agents, each responsible for specific analytical subtasks. Rather than asking an agent to “analyze this stock,” the framework breaks this down into concrete operations: extracting key financial metrics, identifying trend patterns, assessing news sentiment, evaluating macroeconomic context, and synthesizing these inputs into actionable insights. This decomposition mirrors how professional investment teams actually operate, where different specialists contribute focused analyses that feed into collective decision-making.

The evaluation methodology is particularly rigorous. Using Japanese stock market data, the researchers implement leakage-controlled backtesting to ensure that no future information contaminates historical decisions—a common pitfall in financial ML research. The data pipeline integrates multiple information sources: time-series price data, quarterly financial statements, news articles, and macroeconomic indicators, providing a realistic information environment for the agents.

Experimental Results and Performance Analysis

The experimental results strongly validate the fine-grained task decomposition approach. Compared to baseline systems using coarse-grained instructions, the proposed framework achieves substantially higher risk-adjusted returns, measured through metrics like Sharpe ratio and maximum drawdown. This improvement isn’t marginal—it represents a meaningful enhancement in practical trading performance.

What makes these results particularly compelling is the analysis of intermediate outputs. The researchers examine what each agent produces at various stages of the decision pipeline and correlate these outputs with final trading performance. This analysis reveals a critical insight: systems where analytical outputs naturally align with downstream decision preferences perform significantly better. In other words, when an agent’s analysis format and content match what subsequent decision-making agents need, the entire system operates more effectively.

The portfolio optimization experiments add another dimension to the findings. By constructing portfolios that exploit the low correlation between different system outputs and the broader stock index, the researchers achieve even better performance. This suggests that the fine-grained approach not only improves individual system performance but also generates more diverse signals suitable for ensemble methods.

Implications for LLM-Based Trading Systems

This research has profound implications for how we should design LLM-based trading systems. The key takeaway is that task granularity matters enormously. Abstract, high-level instructions may seem intuitive—after all, we tell human analysts “analyze this company”—but LLMs benefit from explicit task decomposition. This finding aligns with broader observations in prompt engineering: specificity and structure improve LLM performance.

The alignment discovery is equally important. It suggests that when designing multi-agent systems, we shouldn’t just think about what each agent does in isolation, but how their outputs fit into the broader workflow. An agent producing brilliant analysis in an incompatible format is less valuable than one producing adequate analysis in exactly the right format for downstream consumption. This points toward the need for careful interface design between agents.

From a practical deployment perspective, the fine-grained approach offers additional benefits beyond performance. The explicit task decomposition makes the system more interpretable—stakeholders can examine specific analytical steps rather than trying to reverse-engineer decisions from opaque agent interactions. This transparency is crucial for regulatory compliance and risk management in real-world trading operations.

The portfolio optimization results suggest a path toward production systems: rather than seeking a single “best” configuration, deploy multiple fine-grained systems with different task decompositions and combine their outputs. The diversity in analytical approaches, when properly orchestrated, can provide robust performance across different market conditions.

Takeaways

1. Fine-grained task decomposition significantly outperforms coarse-grained role-based instructions in multi-agent LLM trading systems, achieving superior risk-adjusted returns on real market data.

2. Alignment between intermediate analytical outputs and downstream decision preferences is a critical driver of overall system performance, suggesting that interface design between agents is as important as individual agent capabilities.

3. Explicit task decomposition enhances system interpretability and transparency, making LLM-based trading systems more suitable for regulated financial environments where decision auditability is essential.

4. Portfolio optimization exploiting low correlation between different system configurations and market indices can further enhance performance, pointing toward ensemble approaches for production deployment.

5. The methodology demonstrates that LLM agents benefit from structured, specific instructions that mirror real-world professional workflows rather than abstract role descriptions, a principle likely applicable beyond financial trading to other complex multi-agent domains.