Sensor Generalization for Adaptive Sensing in Event-based Object Detection via Joint Distribution Training

Paper: 2602.23357 Authors: Aheli Saha, René Schuster, Didier Stricker Categories: cs.CV

Abstract

Event cameras represent a paradigm shift in visual sensing, offering asynchronous, low-latency capture with high dynamic range and minimal motion blur. Despite these advantages, the field faces two critical challenges: limited diversity in available event data and insufficient understanding of how sensor parameters influence model performance. This paper systematically analyzes the impact of intrinsic event camera parameters on object detection tasks and introduces a joint distribution training methodology to build sensor-agnostic models. By understanding parameter sensitivity and leveraging multi-sensor training strategies, the authors demonstrate how to achieve robust performance across different event camera configurations without requiring sensor-specific fine-tuning.

Key Contributions

• Comprehensive analysis of how intrinsic event camera parameters (contrast thresholds, refractory periods, temporal resolution) affect object detection performance
• Introduction of a joint distribution training framework that enables sensor-agnostic model generalization
• Systematic evaluation methodology for assessing parameter sensitivity in event-based vision systems
• Demonstration of cross-sensor robustness without requiring additional calibration or adaptation phases
• Insights into the relationship between event generation mechanisms and downstream detection accuracy

Methodology and Technical Approach

The research employs a rigorous experimental framework to isolate and quantify the effects of individual sensor parameters. Event cameras generate data based on per-pixel brightness changes exceeding a contrast threshold $C$, with temporal precision determined by the sensor’s clock resolution. The authors manipulate three key parameters:

Contrast Threshold ($C$): Controls the sensitivity to brightness changes. Lower thresholds generate more events for subtle changes, while higher thresholds filter out minor variations. The paper examines how varying $C$ affects the signal-to-noise ratio and the density of event streams.

Refractory Period ($t_{ref}$): Defines the minimum time interval between consecutive events from the same pixel. This parameter directly impacts event rate and temporal resolution, with shorter periods enabling finer temporal detail but potentially increasing noise.

Temporal Binning: The aggregation window for converting asynchronous events into tensor representations suitable for neural network processing.

The joint distribution training approach samples from multiple parameter configurations during training, exposing the model to diverse event characteristics. This creates a robust feature space that generalizes across sensor variations. The methodology differs from traditional domain adaptation by not requiring explicit domain labels or separate adaptation stages—instead, it treats parameter variation as a natural part of the data distribution.

Experimental Results and Analysis

The evaluation demonstrates significant performance variations when models trained on one parameter configuration are tested on another. Baseline models show accuracy drops of 15-30% when sensor parameters deviate from training conditions. In contrast, models trained with the joint distribution approach maintain consistent performance across parameter ranges, with degradation limited to 3-8%.

Key findings include:

Threshold Sensitivity: Object detection performance exhibits non-linear sensitivity to contrast thresholds. Extremely low thresholds introduce excessive noise that overwhelms signal, while very high thresholds lose critical edge information. The optimal range varies by scene complexity and lighting conditions.

Temporal Resolution Trade-offs: Shorter refractory periods capture rapid motion more accurately but increase computational load and noise susceptibility. The joint training approach learns to extract robust features regardless of temporal sampling density.

Cross-Sensor Generalization: Models trained on data from multiple sensor configurations successfully generalize to unseen sensors with different parameter settings, validating the sensor-agnostic hypothesis.

The paper includes ablation studies isolating individual parameter effects and combination effects, revealing that joint training on multiple parameters provides greater robustness than training on any single parameter variation alone.

Implications for Event-based Vision

This work addresses a fundamental challenge in deploying event-based vision systems: the dependency on specific sensor configurations. By demonstrating that models can learn parameter-invariant representations, the research enables:

Practical Deployment Flexibility: Systems can operate across different event camera models without retraining, reducing development costs and deployment barriers.

Adaptive Sensing Strategies: Understanding parameter effects enables dynamic adjustment of sensor settings based on scene conditions while maintaining detection accuracy.

Data Efficiency: Joint distribution training leverages existing datasets more effectively by treating parameter variation as data augmentation, reducing the need for extensive sensor-specific data collection.

Theoretical Insights: The success of joint distribution training suggests that event-based features contain sufficient information to be invariant to parameter changes when properly trained, informing future architecture designs.

The approach also has implications for neuromorphic computing, where event cameras interface with spiking neural networks. Parameter-robust models facilitate more flexible hardware-software co-design.

Takeaways

1. Event camera parameters significantly impact object detection performance, with contrast threshold and refractory period being the most influential factors
2. Joint distribution training across multiple parameter configurations enables sensor-agnostic model generalization without explicit domain adaptation
3. Models trained on diverse parameter settings maintain robust performance across unseen sensor configurations, reducing deployment friction
4. The methodology provides a framework for systematic analysis of event camera characteristics and their effects on downstream tasks
5. Parameter-invariant training represents a practical path toward broader adoption of event-based vision in real-world applications where sensor variability is unavoidable