Evidence of an Emergent 'Self' in Continual Robot Learning

Paper: 2603.24350 Authors: Adidev Jhunjhunwala, Judah Goldfeder, Hod Lipson Categories: cs.RO, cs.AI, cs.LG

Abstract

The paper treats the most persistent part of an intelligent system as a candidate for “self.” It compares a robot trained on one steady task with another trained across changing tasks. The continual-learning robot is reported to develop a more stable invariant subnetwork, with a statistically significant difference. The authors propose this as a way to study selfhood in AI systems.

Key Contributions

• Proposes a practical definition of self as the most stable part of cognition over time
• Compares fixed-task training with continual-learning training
• Reports a more invariant internal subnetwork in the continual-learning setting
• Finds a statistically significant difference between the two training regimes
• Frames the method as a way to study self-like structure in other AI systems

Methodology

The paper takes a structural view of selfhood: whatever remains most invariant while the rest of the system adapts may be a useful proxy for self. To test this idea, the authors train one robot on a single stable task and another on a sequence of changing tasks, then compare how much of each system stays the same internally.

That makes the study less about philosophy in the abstract and more about measurable network structure. The continual-learning setup is especially interesting because it forces the system to adapt while preserving useful competence, which should naturally reveal persistent internal components if they exist.

Results

The continual-learning robot develops a more stable invariant subnetwork than the fixed-task baseline. The difference is reported as statistically significant, suggesting this is not just noise from training dynamics.

The result does not prove consciousness or personhood. What it does show is that a system can develop a consistent internal core under continual change, and that this core can be measured. That is a useful empirical handle for future studies.

Takeaways

1. Self can be operationalized as the most invariant part of an adaptive system
2. Continual learning may reveal persistent internal structure that fixed-task training does not
3. The result offers a measurable angle on self-like properties in AI
4. The finding is statistical, not philosophical proof of consciousness
5. Structural persistence could become a useful diagnostic for adaptive robot learning